{"id":69,"date":"2009-07-17T09:14:14","date_gmt":"2009-07-17T13:14:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/?p=69"},"modified":"2009-07-17T09:14:14","modified_gmt":"2009-07-17T13:14:14","slug":"observers-participants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/2009\/07\/17\/observers-participants\/","title":{"rendered":"Observers &#038; Participants"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A former colleague of mine is researching local musicians of a particular genre for her thesis- we&#8217;ll say jazz, for the sake of anonymity.  While this person is delving into the scholarship surrounding various local jazz cultures, etc., she, in general, doesn&#8217;t follow much jazz overall.  That is to say, while the interest on a local level is there, the interest and appreciation for the canon as a whole is lacking.  What does this suggest?  A few possible reasons could be:<\/p>\n<p>1.  Academic scholarship often doesn&#8217;t suggest a strong level of personal interest in a given topic.<br \/>\n2.  The desire to be involved in a &#8220;scene&#8221; or local celebrity.<br \/>\n3.  Having a personal connection to the subjects outweighs the actual product (music, in this case).<br \/>\n4.  The notion that by having a deep &#8220;micro&#8221; knowledge one needn&#8217;t be concerned with the macro.<br \/>\n5.  By not <em>doing<\/em> (i.e., playing jazz herself), immersing and surrounding herself with doers makes her a <em>de facto participant<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>By no means is this an exhaustive list, but these are the first the come to mind.  (Of course, I&#8217;m also speaking from personal experience and interaction with this individual.)  I&#8217;m only using this person as a particular example, as this is something I see as a larger troubling trend.  In graduate school, I noticed a number of colleagues choosing thesis and &#8220;doctoral document&#8221; (a peculiar item in music studies) topics almost by chance.  It was &#8220;Hey, that&#8217;s neat&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;This is something I want to champion.&#8221;  (It wasn&#8217;t unusual for the former reason to eventually transform into the latter, but not in all cases.)<\/p>\n<p>My greatest concern regarding this issue is that &#8220;scholars&#8221; may sometimes be more observers than participants, or tryers rather than doers.  If so, how can this be?  If one is going to immerse oneself in jazz, wouldn&#8217;t that also suggest a participation in the performance of it?  As a close friend and colleague of mine, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mattborghi.com\">Matt Borghi<\/a>, often says, &#8220;It ain&#8217;t that deep.&#8221;  Sometimes it&#8217;s not.  Sometimes it is.  At any rate, how would one know without <em>doing<\/em> (at least on some basic level)?  In an earlier post, I mentioned an academic analysis of The Rolling Stones and their supposed capitalist undermining of their working-class message. Maybe it isn&#8217;t that deep.  Maybe their working-class roots and interest in American blues gave them a solid grounding that transcends whatever commercial success they&#8217;ve since experienced.<\/p>\n<p>Often when performing I&#8217;m more concerned with the music feeling and sounding good than I am with trying to convey some abstract message.  Other times I&#8217;m not.  The point is, I know that because I&#8217;m on stage doing it, and not in the audience (or even backstage) simply making an educated guess.  I know from experience, which is really the best research one can do.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A former colleague of mine is researching local musicians of a particular genre for her thesis- we&#8217;ll say jazz, for the sake of anonymity. While this person is delving into the scholarship surrounding various local jazz cultures, etc., she, in general, doesn&#8217;t follow much jazz overall. That is to say, while the interest on a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education","category-musicology","category-performance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70,"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69\/revisions\/70"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelteager.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}